OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages 1443-1449 (1 August 2000)


View previous. 12 of 46 View next.

Tumor doubling times in metastatic malignant melanoma of the uvea1: Tumor progression before and after treatment

Presented at Societatis Ophthalmologica Europa 1999, Stockholm Sweden, June–July 1999.

Sebastian Eskelin, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Seppo Pyrhönen, MDbc, Paula Summanen, MDa, Marjo Hahka-Kemppinen, MDb, Tero Kivelä, MDa

Abstract 

Objective

To obtain estimates of growth rate of metastatic uveal melanoma to infer appropriate follow-up programs and to assess the impact of current chemoimmunotherapy regimens.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Participants

Of 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma from 1986 through 1998, 37 patients who attended regular follow-up and had measurable metastases were eligible for this study.

Methods

Tumor doubling time (DT) was calculated by the Schwartz formula using three presumed sizes of metastasis at last negative follow-up. DT was compared according to tumor characteristics, and time of micrometastasis was estimated.

Main outcome measures

Doubling time of untreated and treated metastases.

Results

Doubling time of untreated metastases ranged from 34 to 220 days (median, 63 days). Regardless of the presumed size of metastasis at last screening, two thirds of the metastases had a DT between 30 and 80 days. No significant correlation between DT and the observed disease-free interval was detected. Assuming constant growth rate, most metastases had predictably initiated within 5 years before primary treatment. Mean DT during active treatment of metastases in 18 patients who did not show an objective response ranged from 25 to 2619 days (median, 255 days).

Conclusions

Based on the estimated growth rates, a rational follow-up interval to detect metastatic uveal melanoma would be 4 to 6 months. Primary uveal melanomas that develop clinically detectable metastasis after conservative therapy may micrometastasize several years before treatment. These estimates are rough and must be confirmed by prospective studies. Current chemoimmunotherapy regimens slow down the growth rate of metastases even if objective response is not obtained.

Manuscript no. 99652.

a Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

b Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

c Dr. Pyrhönen’s present affiliation is the Department of Oncology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Sebastian Eskelin, MD, Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, P.O. Box 220, FIN-00029 HYKS, Helsinki, Finland

 Supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital (grant no.: TYH8218), The Mary and Georg C. Ehrnrooth Foundation, The Paulo Foundation, and The Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Finland.

1 Received September 22, 1999. Accepted March 28, 2000.

PII: S0161-6420(00)00182-2


View previous. 12 of 46 View next.