OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 454-457 (March 2004)


View previous. 9 of 53 View next.

Contrast sensitivity after wave front–guided LASIK1

Igor Kaiserman, MD, MSc1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Rossen Hazarbassanov, MD2, David Varssano, MD3, Aharon Grinbaum, MD4

Received 4 March 2003; accepted 16 June 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose

To compare the effects on contrast sensitivity of wave front–guided (WFG) versus standard LASIK.

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative clinical study.

Participants

Twenty-four eyes of 13 consecutive patients (mean age, 25.2±8.4 years; spherical equivalent, −0.5 to −4.25 diopters [D]) treated with WFG LASIK (WaveLight-Allegretto scanning-spot laser and wave front analyzer) and 22 eyes of 12 consecutive patients (mean age, 28.4±9.1 years; spherical equivalent, −0.75 to −4.5 D) treated with standard LASIK (WaveLight-Allegretto scanning-spot laser).

Methods

Best-corrected contrast sensitivity was measured before and 1 month after surgery in both the WFG LASIK group and the standard LASIK group. A sine-wave contrast sensitivity test (functional acuity contrast test) was used to measure contrast sensitivity at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree). We compared the LASIK-induced changes in contrast sensitivity in each groups at each spatial frequency.

Main outcome measure

The effect on contrast sensitivity of WFG LASIK versus standard LASIK.

Results

Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved by 72% of eyes treated with WFG LASIK and by 70% of the eyes treated with standard LASIK. One month after LASIK, 88% of the contrast sensitivity measurements improved in the WFG LASIK group, whereas in the standard LASIK group, only 40% of the contrast sensitivity measurements improved. The contrast sensitivity improvement was significantly larger in the WFG LASIK group at all spatial frequencies (P<0.05). The WFG LASIK patients had a negative correlation between the changes in contrast sensitivity and the preoperative refractive error.

Conclusions

The ability of WFG LASIK to correct optical aberrations results in significantly improved contrast sensitivity compared with standard LASIK 1 month after surgery.

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel

2 American Lasers Medical Center, Rishon Le-Zion, Israel

3 Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

4 Department of Ophthalmology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to Igor Kaiserman, MD, MSc, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, P.O.B. 12000, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel.

 Manuscript no. 230117.

1 Drs Kaiserman and Hazarbassanov contributed equally to this work.

PII: S0161-6420(03)01493-3

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.017


View previous. 9 of 53 View next.