OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 463-468 (March 2004)


View previous. 11 of 53 View next.

Avellino corneal dystrophy after LASIK

Roo Min Jun, MD14, Hungwon Tchah, MD2, Tae-im Kim, MD2, R.Doyle Stulting, MD, PhD3, Seung Eun Jung, MS46, Kyoung Yul Seo, MD4, Dong Ho Lee, MD5, Eung Kweon Kim, MD, PhDCorresponding Author Information46email address

Received 21 March 2003; accepted 25 June 2003.

Abstract 

Objective

To report cases of Avellino corneal dystrophy (ACD) exacerbated by LASIK for myopia.

Design

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series and review of the literature.

Participants

Seven patients.

Intervention

Six patients with exacerbation of granular corneal deposits after LASIK were examined for TGFBI mutations by polymerase chain reaction sequencing of DNA. One previously reported patient who was heterozygous for the ACD gene was followed up for 16 months after mechanical removal of granular deposits from the interface after LASIK.

Main outcome measures

Slit-lamp examination, visual acuity, manifest refraction, and DNA sequencing analysis.

Results

All patients were heterozygous for the Avellino dystrophy gene. Corneal opacities appeared 12 months or more after LASIK. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity decreased as the number and density of the opacities increased. One patient underwent mechanical removal of granules from the interface and had a severe recurrence within 16 months. Another patient had removal of the granules from the interface with PTK, followed by treatment with topical mitomycin C. In this patient, the cornea has remained relatively clear for 6 months.

Conclusions

Laser in situ keratomileusis increases the deposition of visually significant corneal opacities and is contraindicated in patients with ACD. Mechanical removal of the material from the interface does not prevent further visually significant deposits. Mitomycin C treatment, in conjunction with surgical removal of opacities, may be an effective treatment.

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

2 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

3 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

4 Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

5 Yonsei Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea

6 The Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Eung Kweon Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemoongu Shinchondong 134, C.P.O. Box 8044, Seoul, South Korea.

 Manuscript no. 230164.

Supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no.: 02-PJ1-PG1-CH02-0003).

The authors have no proprietary interests.

PII: S0161-6420(03)01518-5

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.026


View previous. 11 of 53 View next.