OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages 1853-1859 (October 2004)


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma

Presented at: American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting, March, 2003; San Francisco, California.

Mark S. Juzych, MD, MHSA1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Vikás Chopra, MD1, Michael R. Banitt, MD, MHA1, Bret A. Hughes, MD1, Chaesik Kim, BSEE1, Mark T. Goulas, MD1, Dong H. Shin, MD, PhD1

Received 11 June 2003; accepted 9 April 2004. published online 16 September 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose

To compare the long-term success rate of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT).

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Participants

One hundred ninety-five eyes of 195 patients with uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (OAG), of which 154 eyes underwent ALT and 41 eyes underwent SLT and were followed up for a maximum of 5 years.

Intervention

The SLT patients were treated with the frequency-doubled q-switched neodymium:yytrium–aluminum–garnet laser (532 nm). Approximately 50 to 55 nonoverlapping spots were placed over 180° of the trabecular meshwork at energy levels ranging from 0.6 to 1.0 mJ per pulse. The ALT patients were treated with the argon blue–green laser with between 45 to 55 adjacent, nonoverlapping spots over 180° of the trabecular meshwork at 470 to 1150 mW of energy per pulse.

Main outcome measures

The success rates were defined by criterion I and criterion II. Success by criterion I was defined as a decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) of 3 mmHg or more with no additional medications, laser, or glaucoma surgery. Criterion II had the same requirements as criterion I, except that a 20% or more IOP reduction was required for success.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 37.4±14.7 months for patients in the SLT group and 33.6±17.0 months for patients in the ALT group. The long-term success rate was not significantly different between the ALT and SLT groups by either criterion (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis log-rank P = 0.20 by criterion I and P = 0.12 by criterion II). When comparing patients with and without previous ALT, there was not a statistically significant difference in the patients treated with SLT by either criterion (log-rank P = 0.37 by criterion I and P = 0.39 by criterion II).

Conclusions

In eyes with primary OAG that are receiving maximally tolerated medical therapy, SLT was found to be as effective as ALT in lowering IOP over a 5-year period. However, long-term data reveal that many of the glaucoma patients treated with SLT and ALT required further medical or surgical intervention. Whether SLT has better long-term success than ALT in repeat laser trabeculoplasty treatments remains unclear.

1 Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Mark S. Juzych, MD, MHSA, Kresge Eye Institute and Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4717 St. Antoine Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201-1423, USA.

 Manuscript no. 230371.

Supported by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York.

The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in any product, drug, or device referred to in the article.

PII: S0161-6420(04)00828-0

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.030


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.