OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages 1381-1387 (August 2005)


View previous. 11 of 41 View next.

Nomogram-Based Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment after Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy and LASIK: A New Approach

Vahid Feiz, MD1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Majid Moshirfar, MD (FACS)2, Mark J. Mannis, MD (FACS)1, Charles D. Reilly, MD1, Francisco Garcia-Ferrer, MD1, Jeffrey J. Caspar, MD1, Michele C. Lim, MD1

Received 2 September 2004; accepted 2 March 2005.

Purpose

(1) To evaluate the accuracy of nomogram-based adjustment of intraocular lens (IOL) power to achieve a desired refractive target after cataract surgery in postmyopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) eyes and (2) to compare the accuracy of the nomogram-based method with the clinical history method.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective, interventional, noncomparative case series.

Subjects

Fourteen patients (19 eyes) after myopic LASIK or PRK with visually significant cataracts.

Intervention

All eyes underwent cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. In each case, IOL power was determined with standard keratometry and biometry. Power adjustment was made by use of a theoretical nomogram followed by implantation.

Main Outcome Measures

(1) Final refraction and spherical equivalent after cataract surgery and (2) deviation of the final spherical equivalent from the refractive target.

Results

After cataract extraction, by use of nomogram adjustment, 63.2% of eyes were within 0.5 D of the intended spherical equivalent, 84.2% were within 1.0 diopter of the intended spherical equivalent, and 100% were within 1.5 D of the intended spherical equivalent. The clinical history method was accurate in predicting the correct IOL power in 37.5% of cases, regardless of whether spectacle or corneal plane refraction was used.

Conclusions

(1) Given the change in spherical equivalent induced by myopic LASIK/PRK, IOL power can be adjusted accurately to avoid undercorrection without the need for the prerefractive surgery corneal power. (2) The nomogram-based method was more accurate than the clinical history method.

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.

2 John A. Moran Eye Center Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to Vahid Feiz, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, UC Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817.

 Manuscript no. 2004-76.

Supported, in part, by a grant to the Department of Ophthalmology at University of California, Davis, from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York.

The authors have no financial interest in any of the products or procedures listed in the article.

PII: S0161-6420(05)00452-5

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.010


View previous. 11 of 41 View next.