OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 701-706 (April 2006)


View previous. 30 of 41 View next.

Poststreptococcal Syndrome Uveitis: A Descriptive Case Series and Literature Review

Presented as a scientific poster at: American Academy of Ophthalmology annual meeting, October, 2004; New Orleans, Louisiana.

Shafiq Ur Rehman (FRCOphth)1, Seema Anand (FRCSEd (Ophthal))2Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Aravind Reddy (FRCSEd (Ophthal))2, Oliver C. Backhouse, BSc (FRCOphth)2, Moin Mohamed (FRCOphth)2, Ishtiyak Mahomed (FCS, FRCSEd)3, Arthur D. Atkins (FRCOphth)3, Teifi James, MRCP (FRCOphth)1

Received 24 January 2005; accepted 22 December 2005.

Purpose

To describe the clinical features in a series of patients with poststreptococcal uveitis and to review literature on the pathophysiology and management.

Design

Retrospective and descriptive case series.

Participants

Ten consecutive cases of poststreptococcal syndrome uveitis diagnosed between 1996 and 2003.

Methods

Review of patient case notes.

Main Outcome Measures

Age, laterality, clinical features, and anti-streptococcal lysin O titers.

Results

Ten consecutive cases of poststreptococcal syndrome uveitis were identified. All our cases had bilateral nongranulomatous inflammation and raised anti-streptococcal lysin O titers. Collating data from previous reports and this series showed that 96% of the patients were below 40 years of age, and 87.5% had evidence of previous streptococcal infection. One third of the patients had posterior segment involvement. In our patients, this was in the form of vitritis, focal retinitis, optic disc swelling, and multifocal choroiditis.

Conclusions

Poststreptococcal syndrome uveitis should be considered in the etiology of acute bilateral nongranulomatous uveitis in children and young patients.

1 Calderdale Royal Hospital, Halifax, United Kingdom

2 Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom

3 Department of Ophthalmology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Ms Seema Anand, 2, Woodlea Gate, Meanwood, Leeds, LS6 4SR, United Kingdom

 Manuscript no. 2005-76.

No author has any financial interests in any of the products/equipment mentioned in the article. No author has any conflict of interest related to any product/equipment mentioned in the article or in the preparation and publication of the manuscript itself.

PII: S0161-6420(06)00071-6

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.024


View previous. 30 of 41 View next.