OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 113, Issue 7, Pages 1159-1164 (July 2006)


View previous. 18 of 50 View next.

Ocular Trauma in a Rural Population of Southern India: The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study

Sannapaneni Krishnaiah, MSc, MPS12Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Praveen K. Nirmalan, MD, MPH1, Bindiganavale R. Shamanna, MD, MSc1, Marmamula Srinivas, MSc1, Gullapalli N. Rao, MD1, Ravi Thomas, MD1

Received 22 October 2005; accepted 14 February 2006.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of ocular trauma and proportion of blindness and visual impairment due to ocular trauma in a rural population of southern India.

Design

Population-based cross-sectional epidemiological study.

Participants

A total of 7771 subjects of all ages, representative of the rural population of Andhra Pradesh.

Methods

The subjects underwent a detailed interview and comprehensive ocular evaluation as part of the population-based Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

Main Outcome

An eye was considered to be blind due to trauma if best-corrected distance visual acuity was worse than 6/60 and the cause was attributed to ocular trauma.

Results

A total of 824 (10.6%) subjects gave a history of ocular trauma in either eye, including 76 (1.0%) persons reporting trauma in both eyes. The overall age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of history of eye injury in this rural population was 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0%–8.1%). Men were more likely to have an eye injury than women (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 [95% CI, 1.8–2.5]). After adjusting for gender and other demographic factors, ocular trauma was significantly more frequent among laborers (OR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2–1.7]) when compared with other occupational groups. After adjusting for gender, injury with vegetable matter such as a thorn, branch of a tree, plant secretion, etc. (n = 373 [45.3%]) was the major cause of trauma reported in this population. The majority of the eye injuries occurred at the workplace (n = 461 [55.9%]), followed by home (n = 179 [21.7%]). The majority of those affected (n = 806 [97.8%]) did not wear any eye protection at the time of trauma. A significant proportion (n = 307 [43.1%]) of subjects who sought treatment for an eye injury went to an ophthalmologist. Trauma was responsible for unilateral blindness in 39 subjects, an age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%–0.8%).

Conclusions

Most ocular injuries in this rural population occurred at the workplace, suggesting the need to explore workplace strategies to minimize ocular trauma as a priority. Eye care programs targeting high-risk ocular trauma groups may need to consider ocular trauma as a priority in eye health awareness strategies to reduce blindness due to trauma.

1 L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

2 Vision Cooperative Research Center and School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Sannapaneni Krishnaiah, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 034, India.

 Manuscript no. 2005-1014.

Supported by grants from the Christoffel-Blindenmission, Bensheim, Germany, and the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

PII: S0161-6420(06)00278-8

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.020


View previous. 18 of 50 View next.