OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages 1779-1784.e1 (October 2006)


View previous. 17 of 49 View next.

Results from the Multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study

Presented at: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, October 2005, Chicago, Illinois.

Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study GroupBrian L. Zerbe, MD1, Michael W. Belin, MD2Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Joseph B. Ciolino, MD1

Received 26 October 2005; accepted 12 May 2006. published online 25 July 2006.

Purpose

To report indications, practices, complications, and outcomes from the first multicenter study on the Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Design

Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

Participants

We analyzed 141 Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis surgical procedures, from 17 surgical sites, done from January 2003 through September 2005 in 136 eyes of 133 patients.

Methods

Forms reporting 70 preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were collected and analyzed at a central data collection site (Cornea Consultants of Albany, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York).

Main Outcome Measures

Visual acuity (VA) and keratoprosthesis survival.

Results

Common preoperative diagnoses were graft rejection, in 73 eyes (54%) (average prior grafts, 2.24); chemical injury (20 eyes [15%]); bullous keratopathy (19 eyes [14%]); and herpes simplex virus keratitis (9 eyes [7%]). Additionally, 82 eyes (60%) had preoperative glaucoma. Preoperative best-corrected VA ranged from 20/100 to light perception, and was <20/200 in 96% of eyes. At an average follow-up of 8.5 months (range, 0.03–24; standard deviation, 6.1; median, 12), postoperative vision improved to ≥20/200 in 57%. Among eyes at least 1 year after the operation (62 eyes), vision was ≥20/200 in 56% of eyes and ≥20/40 in 23%. At an average follow-up of 8.5 months, graft retention was 95%. Severe visual loss or failure to improve from keratoprosthesis was usually secondary to comorbidities such as advanced glaucoma, macular degeneration, or retinal detachment.

Conclusions

The Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis seems, based on early follow-up, to be a viable option after multiple failed corneal grafts or in some situations of a poor prognosis for primary penetrating keratoplasty.

1 Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.

2 Cornea Consultants of Albany, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Michael W. Belin, MD, 156 Thornberry Lane, Rensselaer, NY 12144.

 Manuscript no. 2005-1029.

Supported in part by an educational grant from Sight Society of North Eastern New York, Albany, New York, and Lions Eye Bank at Albany, Albany, New York.

The authors have no financial interest in the material or products discussed in the article.

 See “Appendix” for Group membership.

PII: S0161-6420(06)00676-2

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.015


View previous. 17 of 49 View next.