OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages 1713-1719 (October 2006)


View previous. 7 of 49 View next.

Comparison of the Magnitude and Time Course of Macular Thinning Induced by Different Interventions for Diabetic Macular Edema: Implications for Sequence of Application

Presented at: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, October 15–18, 2005, Chicago, Illinois.

David J. Browning, MD, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Christina M. Fraser, BA, Michele E. Powers

Received 19 November 2005; accepted 16 May 2006. published online 02 August 2006.

Purpose

To determine estimates of the magnitude and time course of macular thinning induced by three interventions for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Design

Retrospective observational case series.

Participants

Two hundred eleven eyes of 133 patients of a private retina practice, each diagnosed with DME in ≥1 eye.

Methods

Review of clinical charts and optical coherence tomography measurements of eyes receiving focal laser photocoagulation, intravitreal triamcinolone injection (IVTA), or vitrectomy compared to untreated fellow eyes without DME.

Main Outcome Measures

Central subfield mean thickness (CSMT; in micrometers), total macular volume (cubic millimeters), visual acuity, and rates of increased macular thickening at follow-up.

Results

At 6 months follow-up, predicted change in CSMT is 0 μm for untreated fellow eyes without DME, −28 μm for eyes receiving focal laser, −83 μm for eyes receiving triamcinolone, and −92 μm for eyes receiving vitrectomy. The predicted change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters read at 6 months is 0 for untreated fellow eyes without DME, 0 for eyes receiving focal laser, +3 for eyes receiving IVTA, and −1 for eyes receiving vitrectomy. Increased thickening of the macula after interventions designed to thin it were 25.4% for focal laser, 3.8% for IVTA, and 19.0% for vitrectomy.

Conclusions

Interventions for DME differ in effect size, durability of effects, and potential for subsequent increases in macular thickness. A prospective study to elucidate a preferred sequence of interventions in DME may be worthwhile.

Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to David J. Browning, MD, PhD, 6035 Fairview Road, Charlotte, NC 28210.

 Manuscript no. 2005-1124.

The authors have no commercial or proprietary interest in the products or companies mentioned in the article.

PII: S0161-6420(06)00688-9

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.021


View previous. 7 of 49 View next.