OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages 2012-2019 (November 2006)


View previous. 17 of 46 View next.

Proton Beam Irradiation for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Presented in part at: Retina Society Annual Meeting, December 1999, Wailea, Hawaii.

Hadi J. Zambarakji, FRCOphth, MD1, Anne Marie Lane, MPH1, Eric Ezra, FRCOphth, MD1, Danny Gauthier, MD1, Michael Goitein, PhD2, Judy A. Adams, CMD, RT(T)(R)2, John E. Munzenrider, MD2, Joan W. Miller, MD1, Evangelos S. Gragoudas, MD1Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 12 July 2005; accepted 26 May 2006. published online 25 August 2006.

Objective

To evaluate safety and visual outcomes after proton therapy for subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Randomized dose-ranging clinical trial.

Participants

One hundred sixty-six patients with angiographic evidence of classic choroidal neovascularization resulting from AMD and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/320 or better.

Methods

Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 16-cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) or 24-CGE proton radiation in 2 equal fractions. Visual acuity was measured using standardized protocol refraction. Complete ophthalmological examinations, color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography were performed before and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment.

Main Outcome Measure

Proportion of eyes losing 3 or more lines of vision from baseline. Kaplan–Meier statistics were used to compare cumulative rates of vision loss between the 2 treatment groups.

Results

At 12 months after treatment, 36 eyes (42%) and 27 eyes (35%) lost 3 or more lines of vision in the 16-CGE and 24-CGE groups, respectively. Rates increased to 62% in the 16-CGE group and 53% in the 24-CGE group by 24 months after treatment (P = 0.40). Radiation complications developed in 15.7% of patients receiving 16 CGE and 14.8% of patients receiving 24 CGE.

Conclusions

No significant differences in rates of visual loss were found between the 2 dose groups. Proton radiation may be useful as an adjuvant therapy or as an alternative for patients who decline or are not appropriate for approved therapies.

1 Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Evangelos S. Gragoudas, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114.

 Manuscript no. 2005-636.

Supported by the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Retina Research and Melanoma Research Funds, Boston, Massachusetts; T. F. C. Frost Trust, London, United Kingdom; and Cripplegate and Dowsett Educational Fund, London, United Kingdom.

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the article.

PII: S0161-6420(06)00722-6

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.036


View previous. 17 of 46 View next.