OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages 1212-1214.e1 (June 2007)


View previous. 32 of 49 View next.

Estimating Choroidal Melanoma Volume: Comparison of Methods

Arun D. Singh, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Sam Terman, LuAnne Sculley, RDMS

Received 12 July 2006; accepted 23 August 2006. published online 23 February 2007.

Purpose

To evaluate published methods of estimating choroidal melanoma volume.

Design

Prospective consecutive case series.

Participants

Ten consecutive patients with primary choroidal melanoma.

Methods

After determination of tumor dimensions (largest tumor basal diameter, basal perpendicular diameter, and height), tumor volume was calculated for each tumor by using the 5 published methods. Percent differences in tumor volume were determined for each tumor as calculated by different methods.

Main Outcome Measure

Choroidal melanoma volume.

Results

The mean variation in estimated tumor volume expressed as a ratio was 2.33 (range, 1.64–3.84).

Conclusions

Choroidal melanoma volume calculation methods are inconsistent and caution is needed when volume measures are used for prognostic classification.

Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Arun D. Singh, MD, Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

 Manuscript no. 2006-768.

 The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the article.

PII: S0161-6420(06)01337-6

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.056


View previous. 32 of 49 View next.