Ophthalmology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1073-1079.e2, June 2007

Bacterial Keratitis after Penetrating Keratoplasty:

Incidence, Microbiological Profile, Graft Survival, and Visual Outcome

  • Michael D. Wagoner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    • Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Michael D. Wagoner, MD, Medical Director, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, PO Box 7191, Riyadh 11462, Saudi Arabia.
  • ,
  • Samar A. Al-Swailem, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • ,
  • John E. Sutphin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • ,
  • M. Bridgett Zimmerman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Received 29 June 2006; accepted 10 October 2006. published online 31 January 2007.

Purpose

To determine the incidence, microbiological profile, graft survival, and factors influencing graft survival after the development of bacterial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Design

Retrospective case series.

Participants

One hundred two patients (102 eyes) treated at a single center during a 5-year period.

Methods

Retrospective review of the medical records of every patient treated for culture-positive keratitis between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2002 who previously had undergone penetrating keratoplasty at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital.

Main Outcome Measures

Graft survival and visual outcome.

Results

There were 2103 PKs performed and 102 (4.9%) cases of culture-positive keratitis during the study period. There were 168 bacterial isolates, of which 140 (83.3%) were gram positive, 28 (16.7%) were gram negative, and 1 (0.6%) was acid fast. Only 38 (37.3%) grafts remained clear after a mean follow-up of 985 days (range, 82–2284). The best graft survival was in eyes with PK for keratoconus (83.7%), whereas the poorest grat survival was for previously failed grafts (5.6%). By Kaplan–Meier analysis, there was an immediate steep decline in graft survival to 54.9%, followed by a slow decline to 47.2% by 1 year and 35.8% after 4 years. Factors associated with an increased risk of graft failure were the surgical indication for PK (P<0.001), increasing patient age (P = 0.004), smaller donor (P = 0.001) and recipient (P = 0.0003) graft size, history of previous microbial keratitis (P = 0.02) or endothelial rejection episodes (P = 0.02), and coexisting glaucoma (P = 0.001). The visual outcome was ≥20/40 in only 8 (8.2%) eyes and better than 20/200 in only 21 (21.6%) eyes.

Conclusion

The development of bacterial keratitis after PK is a serious complication that is associated with a high incidence of graft failure and poor visual outcome.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Manuscript no. 2006-711.

 The authors have no conflicts of interest with or proprietary interest in any of the topics presented in the article.

PII: S0161-6420(06)01372-8

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.015

Ophthalmology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1073-1079.e2, June 2007