OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 949-956 (June 2008)


View previous. 7 of 43 View next.

Mapping of Macular Substructures with Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma Diagnosis

Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study GroupOu Tan, PhDCorresponding Author Information, Gisèle Li, MD, Ake Tzu-Hui Lu, PhD, Rohit Varma, MD, MPH, David Huang, MD, PhD

Received 15 February 2007; received in revised form 27 July 2007; accepted 6 August 2007. published online 05 November 2007.

Purpose

To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to identify the specific retinal layers and macular regions damaged in glaucoma.

Design

Observational cross-sectional study.

Participants

One hundred forty-nine participants in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study, divided into 3 groups: normal (N) perimetric glaucoma (PG), and glaucoma suspect and preperimetric glaucoma (GSPPG) with 44, 73, and 29 persons, respectively.

Methods

The Zeiss Stratus OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) was used to map the macula over a 6-mm diameter and to scan the circumpapillary nerve fiber layer (cpNFL). The macular OCT images were exported for automatic segmentation using software developed by the authors. The thickness of the macular nerve fiber layer (mNFL), ganglion cell layer (mGCL), inner plexiform layer (mIPL), inner nuclear layer (mINL), outer retinal layer (mORL), and total retinal thickness were measured. Thickness measurements of GSPPG and PG eyes were compared with those of N eyes. The ability to differentiate between GSPPG and PG eyes against N eyes was assessed by fractional loss, standardized deviation, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Main Outcome Measures

Area-weighted average thicknesses of retinal sublayers in the macula.

Results

The mNFL, mGCL, mIPL, and mINL were significantly (P<0.001) thinner in both the GSPPG and PG eyes than in the N eyes. In PG eyes, mNFL, mGCL, and mIPL thinning was most severe (approximately 20%), mINL thinning was intermediate (7%), and mORL thinning was minimal (3%). The repeatability (coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation) of thickness measurements was improved by combining the mNFL, mGCL, and mIPL measurements as the inner retinal layer (mIRL). The mIRL was the best macular parameter for glaucoma diagnosis and had discriminant power comparable with that of the cpNFL. The fractional loss of mIRL thickness was most severe in the inferior perifoveal region for both the PG and GSPPG groups.

Conclusions

Glaucoma leads to thinning of the mNFL, mGCL, mIPL, and mINL, even before detectable visual field changes occur. A combination of the 3 innermost layers seems to provide optimal glaucoma detection. Increasing the sampling of peripheral macula with a new OCT scan pattern may improve glaucoma diagnosis further.

Available online: November 5, 2007.

Doheny Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Ou Tan, PhD, Doheny Eye Institute, 1355 San Pablo Street, DVRC160-C, Los Angeles, CA 90033.

 Manuscript no. 2007-211.

 Supported by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (grant nos. R01 EY013516, P30 EY03040), and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York.

 Dr Huang receives patent royalty and research grants from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

 A complete list of Study Group members is available at http://www.AIGStudy.net.

PII: S0161-6420(07)00878-0

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.011


View previous. 7 of 43 View next.