OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 115, Issue 7, Pages 1187-1195.e1 (July 2008)


View previous. 16 of 38 View next.

Rainbow Glare as an Optical Side Effect of IntraLASIK

Ronald R. Krueger, MD, MSE1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Ivey L. Thornton, MD12, Meng Xu, PhD3, Zsolt Bor, PhD4, Thomas J.T.P. van den Berg, PhD5

Received 28 February 2007; received in revised form 15 September 2007; accepted 5 October 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Purpose

To report a new optical side effect associated with the IntraLASIK procedure.

Design

Retrospective chart review and questionnaire of all patients treated with IntraLASIK from June 2004 to August 2005.

Participants

A cohort of 585 eyes (312 patients) was divided sequentially into those treated with the older-model IntraLase laser (group 1: 399 eyes of 215 patients) and those treated with the newer model (group 2: 186 eyes of 97 patients).

Methods

Preoperative and postoperative refraction, visual acuity, pupillometry, pachymetry, intraocular pressure, mean topographic power and cylinder, wavefront aberrations, and answers to a questionnaire of symptoms were recorded. The precise spatial extent of the rainbow spectrum was drawn by select patients for calculation of the diffractive grating size responsible for the light scatter. A glass slide was also irradiated and photographed using the older model to simulate the rainbow spectrum.

Main Outcome Measures

The symptom of rainbow glare was correlated with preoperative and postoperative factors and time between the most recent service call and surgery.

Results

In group 1, 90.2% of patients were successfully contacted, and 37 (69 eyes) reported symptoms of rainbow glare around lights, for an incidence of 19.07%. In group 2, 88.6% of patients were contacted, and 2 (4 eyes) reported similar symptoms, for an incidence of 2.32%. The odds ratio (OR) between the 2 groups is 9.4 (P<0.001). For every 10-μm increase in ablation depth, the OR is 1.2 (P = 0.038), and for every 30 days from the last service call, it is 1.5 (P = 0.007). The spatial extent of the color pattern was used to calculate the spacing array at ∼9 μm, corresponding to the laser spot and line separation.

Conclusions

Light scattering from the back surface of the IntraLASIK flap creates a spectral pattern whose visual impact is clinically inconsequential in the majority of patients. The spectral pattern and visual angle correspond to a grating size that matches the raster spot separation of IntraLase pulsing. Eyes treated with newer focusing optics of higher numerical aperture reduced the rainbow symptom. Variance in optical quality and numerical aperture can impact the spot size and uniformity of IntraLase flap creation.

Available online: December 27, 2007.

1 Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

3 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

4 IntraLase Corporation, Irvine, California.

5 Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to Dr Ronald R. Krueger, Medical Director of the Department of Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

 Manuscript no. 2007-289.

 Supported by a Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, New York) Challenge Grant to Department of Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

 Dr Bor is an employee of IntraLase Corp. The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in relation to the article.

PII: S0161-6420(07)01090-1

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.007


View previous. 16 of 38 View next.