OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 115, Issue 9, Pages 1460-1467 (September 2008)


View previous. 7 of 55 View next.

Age–Period–Cohort Effect on the Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Beaver Dam Eye Study

Ronald Klein, MD, MPH1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Michael D. Knudtson, MS1, Kristine E. Lee, MS1, Ronald E. Gangnon, PhD2, Barbara E.K. Klein, MD, MPH1

Received 19 September 2007; received in revised form 24 January 2008; accepted 28 January 2008.

Objective

To examine relationships of age, period, and birth cohort with the 5-year incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Population-based cohort study with 4 examination visits 5 years apart from 1988 through 1990, 1993 through 1995, 1998 through 2000, and 2003 through 2005.

Participants

Two thousand nine hundred sixty-eight persons (6603 participant visits) and 3588 persons (8184 participant visits) 43 to 86 years of age at baseline contributing to the incidence of early and late AMD, respectively.

Methods

Grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System.

Main Outcome Measures

Five-year incidence of early AMD.

Results

While controlling for age, there was a lower 5-year incidence of early AMD in later rather than in earlier birth cohorts (odds ratio per increasing category, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.78; P<0.001). This remained while controlling for smoking, blood pressure, and other related factors. There was no evidence for a period or birth cohort effect with late AMD.

Conclusions

Lower incidence of early AMD in more recent birth cohorts is likely the result of unmeasured risk factors for early AMD. Further study of possible unmeasured risk factors that may have caused this cohort effect may help to identify new modifiable risk factors for AMD. Diminishing incidence of early AMD in later birth cohorts would be expected to result in lower long-term estimates of future incidence of AMD than do current estimates that do not take this effect into account.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

2 Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Ronald Klein, MD, MPH, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 North Walnut Street, 417 WARF, Madison, WI 53726-2336

 Manuscript no. 2007-1222.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

 Supported by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (grant no. EY06594 [RK, BEKK]), and in part by Senior Scientific Investigator Awards from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York (RK, BEKK). The National Eye Institute provided funding for the entire study, including collection and analyses of data; Research to Prevent Blindness provided further additional support for data analyses.

PII: S0161-6420(08)00093-6

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.026


View previous. 7 of 55 View next.