OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 349-354 (February 2009)


View previous. 29 of 39 View next.

Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants

Jean Y. Chuo, MD1, Peter J. Dolman, MD, FRCSC1Corresponding Author Information, Tony L. Ng, MD2, Frank V. Buffam, MD, FRCSC1, Valerie A. White, MD, FRCPC12

Received 27 January 2008; received in revised form 29 August 2008; accepted 12 September 2008. published online 16 December 2008.

Purpose

To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation.

Design

Case series.

Participants

Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied.

Methods

The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all patients requiring explantation of PP orbital implants between 1997 and 2006 by 2 oculoplastic surgeons at the University of British Columbia.

Main Outcome Measures

Clinical data obtained included patient demographics, the nature of the primary surgery, and the clinical presentation leading to eventual implant removal. The histopathologic data observed included the presence of anterior exposure, area of fibrovascular ingrowth, type of inflammation, and presence and type of bacterial colonies.

Results

Nine (50%) of the 18 patients studied were referred from other surgeons. The balance represented 3.2% of all PP implants placed by the 2 surgeons. The procedures for the primary surgery were 12 enucleations (67%), 5 eviscerations (28%), and 1 secondary implant (5%). Clinical findings included anterior implant exposure and discharge in all cases. Histopathologic analysis was performed in all of the implants and showed less than 50% fibrovascular ingrowth in 16 implants (89%) and predominantly acute or mixed inflammation in 15 (83%). Foreign body giant cells were seen adjacent to the implant material in all cases. Bacterial colonies on gram stain were identified in 12 specimens (67%); overall, gram-positive cocci in clusters or chains were found in 10 implants (56%), and gram-negative bacteria were found in 1 (5.5%). Thirteen patients (72%) lived in locations distant from Vancouver, the surgical center.

Conclusions

This article presents the largest review of explanted porous polyethylene orbital spheres. The findings suggest that anterior exposure allows bacterial colonization and the development of a heavy inflammatory infiltrate. Poor tissue ingrowth may limit the penetration of topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, leading to the necessity for explantation.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Available online: December 16, 2008.

1 Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

2 Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Peter J. Dolman, Eye Care Centre, 2550 Willow Street, Section I, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 3N9

 Manuscript no. 2008-135.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

PII: S0161-6420(08)00941-X

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.022


View previous. 29 of 39 View next.