OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 116, Issue 4, Pages 702-709 (April 2009)


View previous. 18 of 45 View next.

Comparison of Night Driving Performance after Wavefront-Guided and Conventional LASIK for Moderate Myopia

Steve C. Schallhorn, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, David J. Tanzer, MD, Sandor E. Kaupp, MS, Mitch Brown, OD, Stephanie E. Malady, BS

Received 30 May 2008; received in revised form 19 November 2008; accepted 15 December 2008.

Purpose

To compare preoperative and postoperative changes in simulated night driving performance after wavefront-guided (wLASIK) and conventional LASIK (cLASIK) for the treatment of moderate myopia.

Design

Retrospective, comparative study.

Participants

All eyes of subjects with a preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) between −4.50 and −6.00 who underwent night driving simulator (NDS) testing from 2 clinical trials were entered into the study. This comprised 38 cLASIK patients (62 eyes; mean −5.46 diopters [D] MSE) and 21 wLASIK patients (36 eyes, mean −5.20 D MSE).

Methods

Patients' records were reviewed from 2 LASIK clinical trials that had similar enrollment criteria. One trial treated patients with conventional LASIK using a bladed microkeratome (cLASIK) and the other treated with a wavefront-guided profile using a femtosecond laser (wLASIK). In both trials, patients with moderate myopia were asked to participate in NDS testing.

Main Outcome Measures

The detection and identification distances of road hazards were measured with and without a glare source before and 6 months after LASIK. Each eye was tested independently in best-corrected trial frames by a masked operator.

Results

In every category, there was a mean reduction in the preoperative to postoperative NDS performance after cLASIK (mean change, −21.3 to −27.9 ft, −6.5 to −8.5 m; 95% confidence interval [CI], −12.0 to −41.3 ft, −3.7 to −12.6 m); there was a corresponding mean improvement after wLASIK (mean change +15.0 to +29.1 ft, +4.6 to +8.9 m; 95% CI, +8.3 to +41.5 ft, +2.5 to +12.6 m). Significant differences between cLASIK and wLASIK NDS performance was observed in every category (P<0.;01, Tukey's honest significant difference for unequal numbers). A clinical relevant loss of NDS performance (>0.5 seconds) was observed in 32% to 38% of cLASIK eyes for all tasks, whereas only 0% to 3% of eyes had this loss after wLASIK. Between 2% and 7% of cLASIK eyes and 11% and 31% of eyes had a significant postoperative improvement in NDS performance in every task.

Conclusions

Wavefront-guided LASIK to correct myopia combined with a femtosecond laser flap significantly improved mean night driving visual performance and was significantly better than cLASIK using a mechanical keratome.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found after the references.

The Navy Refractive Surgery Center, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Steve Schallhorn, 11730 Caminito Prenticia, San Diego, CA 92131

 Manuscript no. 2008-664.

 Financial Disclosure(s): S. Schallhorn is a consultant for Advanced Medical Optics and AcuFocus. No other authors has any proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

 Funded by the Commander Naval Air Forces but had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

PII: S0161-6420(08)01338-9

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.038


View previous. 18 of 45 View next.