OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 116, Issue 8, Pages 1510-1514 (August 2009)


View previous. 18 of 40 View next.

Development and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy 12 Months after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology annual meeting, March 2007, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Thomas Hong, BAppSci1, Paul Mitchell, MD, PhD1, Tania de Loryn, MA, DipClinPsych1, Elena Rochtchina, MAppStat1, Sudha Cugati, MBBS, MS1, Jie Jin Wang, MMed, PhD12Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 2 September 2008; received in revised form 26 February 2009; accepted 3 March 2009. published online 05 June 2009.

Objective

To assess whether phacoemulsification cataract surgery exacerbates the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a cataract surgical cohort.

Design

Clinic-based cohort study.

Participants

Patients aged 65+ years undergoing cataract surgery at an eye clinic in Sydney, Australia, between 2004 and 2006.

Methods

Digital retinal photography was performed after pupil dilation preoperatively and at 1-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. DR was assessed using the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) classification. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative (baseline) photographs were compared side-by-side with 12-month postoperative photographs. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for DR progression in operated (pseudophakic) compared with nonoperated (phakic) eyes, adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, and preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin level.

Main Outcome Measures

Incident DR was defined in eyes without DR at baseline in which DR was detected at 12-month postoperative visits. DR progression was defined as an increase of 1 or more ETDRS steps during the same period, including incident cases.

Results

Of 1994 surgical patients recruited, 190 (9.53%) with diabetes and complete data and thus were included. There were 56 patients with unilateral surgery performed before baseline (mean postoperative duration 3.3±3.3 years). The prevalence of DR at baseline was higher in these 56 pseudophakic eyes than in 324 phakic eyes (71.4% vs. 48.2%, respectively, adjusted OR 2.16; 95% CI, 1.16–4.03). Of the 190 patients, 169 were followed for 12+ months postoperatively; 278 eyes were pseudophakic, and 60 eyes remained phakic at 12 months. During the 12-month postoperative period, incident DR developed in 28.2% of pseudophakic eyes and 13.8% of phakic eyes (adjusted OR 2.65; 95% CI, 1.06–6.61). In a paired-eye comparison of 45 patients who remained unilaterally pseudophakic at 12 months and were at risk of DR progression, 35.6% of pseudophakic eyes exhibited DR progression compared with 20.0% of the fellow phakic eyes (adjusted OR 2.21; 95% CI, 0.85–5.71).

Conclusions

Diabetic patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery appear to have a doubling of DR progression rates 12 months after surgery. This outcome, however, represents less progression than was previously documented with intracapsular and extracapsular cataract surgical techniques.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Available online: June 5, 2009.

1 Centre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2 Centre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Jie Jin Wang, MMed, PhD, Centre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145

 Manuscript no. 2008-1050.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

 Supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia (Grant No 302010). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

PII: S0161-6420(09)00233-4

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.003


View previous. 18 of 40 View next.