OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 116, Issue 11, Pages 2058-2063.e1 (November 2009)


View previous. 7 of 48 View next.

Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Reiko Arita, MD, PhD12Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Kouzo Itoh, MD, PhD1, Syuji Maeda, MD, PhD3, Koshi Maeda, MD, PhD3, Ayumu Furuta, MD3, Shima Fukuoka, MD2, Atsuo Tomidokoro, MD, PhD2, Shiro Amano, MD, PhD2

Received 13 January 2009; received in revised form 25 February 2009; accepted 11 April 2009. published online 10 September 2009.

Purpose

To compare clinical findings between patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and normal controls and to propose diagnostic criteria for obstructive MGD.

Design

Cross-sectional, observational case series.

Participants

Fifty-three eyes of 53 patients (18 men, 35 women; age [mean ± standard deviation] 71.4 ± 10.0 years) who were diagnosed with obstructive MGD and 60 eyes of 60 healthy volunteers (22 men, 38 women; 71.0 ± 9.3 years) as a control group.

Methods

Ocular symptoms were scored from 0 to 14 according to the number of existing symptoms. Lid margin abnormality was scored from 0 to 4 depending on the number of existing abnormalities. Meibomian gland changes were scored from 0 to 6 based on noncontact meibography (meibo-score). Superficial punctuate keratopathy (SPK) was scored from 0 to 3. Meibum was graded from 0 to 3 depending on the volume and quality. Tear film production was evaluated by Schirmer's test. Receiver operating characteristic curves with calculations of area under the curve (AUC) were used to describe the accuracy of each parameter to differentiate obstructive MGD from normal eyes.

Main Outcome Measures

Ocular symptom score, lid margin abnormality score, meibo-score, meibum score, SPK score, tear film breakup time (BUT), and the Schirmer value.

Results

Ocular symptom score, lid margin abnormality score, meibo-score, meibum score, and SPK score were significantly higher in the obstructive MGD group than in the control group (P<0.0001 for all scores). The BUT was significantly shorter in the obstructive MGD group than in the control group (P<0.0001). The AUC values indicated that the ocular symptom score had the highest diagnostic power as a single parameter, followed by the lid margin abnormality score, meibo-score, and BUT.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, we recommend that physicians use the ocular symptom score, lid margin abnormality score, and meibo-score to diagnose MGD. Obstructive MGD should be suspected when any 2 of the 3 scores are abnormal. Obstructive MGD is very likely when all 3 scores are abnormal.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Available online: September 10, 2009.

1 Itoh Clinic, Saitama, Japan

2 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

3 Maeda Ophthalmic Clinic, Fukushima, Japan

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Reiko Arita, MD, PhD, 626-11 Minaminakano, Minuma-ku, Saitama city, Saitama, 337-0042, Japan

 Drs Arita and Amano are applying with Topcon for a patent in the meibography technique described in this manuscript.

 Manuscript no. 2009-51.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

PII: S0161-6420(09)00423-0

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.037


View previous. 7 of 48 View next.