OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 103-108 (January 2010)


View previous. 19 of 44 View next.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Variation and the Response to Photodynamic Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Presented in part at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, 2008, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; and at the Club Jules Gonín Meeting, 2008, St Moritz, Switzerland.

Ilkka Immonen, MD1Corresponding Author Information, Sanna Seitsonen, MD1, Petri Tommila, MD1, Tiia Kangas-Kontio, MSc2, Sakari Kakko, MD2, Eeva-Riitta Savolainen, MD3, Markku J. Savolainen, MD2, M. Johanna Liinamaa, MD24

Received 19 March 2008; received in revised form 14 June 2009; accepted 18 June 2009. published online 06 November 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphisms in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Retrospective, comparative case series.

Participants

Patients with recent exudative AMD (n = 162) and age-matched subjects without AMD (n = 85).

Methods

Fluorescein angiography (FA), clinical examination, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping.

Main Outcome Measures

The frequencies of 3 VEGF gene SNPs were analyzed, 1 at the promoter site (rs699947, A→C) and 2 intronic SNPs (rs2146323, A→C, and rs3025033, A→G), in relation to the risk of AMD, to choroidal neovascular (CNV) lesion size and configuration, and to the anatomic response to photodynamic therapy (PDT). These SNPs were chosen to cover all the haploblocks of the VEGF gene. The 86 patients who had undergone PDT were classified as either PDT responders or PDT nonresponders based on the outcome of PDT after the last treatment session. For the PDT responders, the treating physician had deemed the lesion to be clinically dry and without leakage from CNV in FA at a visit scheduled at least 12 weeks after the last PDT treatment. For the PDT nonresponders, the PDT sessions had been discontinued by the treating retina specialist because of an apparently poor response and a still exudative lesion after several PDT sessions.

Results

The presence of exudative AMD or lesion size or configuration was not associated with the SNPs studied here. The frequencies of the rs699947 were significantly different in PDT nonresponders and PDT responders. The AA, AC, and CC genotypes were 14%, 39%, and 46%, respectively, in PDT nonresponders, compared with 40%, 48%, and 12%, respectively, in the PDT responders (P = 0.0008). The corresponding frequencies for the rs2146323 AA, AC, and CC genotypes were 4%, 32%, and 64%, respectively, in nonresponders and 24%, 38%, and 38%, respectively, in responders (P = 0.0369). The genotypes of the rs3025033 SNP were distributed evenly between the responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions

The VEGF gene polymorphic SNPs at rs699947 and rs2146323 are strong determinants of the anatomic outcome after PDT, but the SNPs studied were not associated with the presence of exudative AMD or with the CNV lesion size or configuration.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Available online: November 6, 2009.

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

2 Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Research Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

4 Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Ilkka Immonen, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

 Manuscript no. 2008-368.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

 Supported by The Eye Foundation, Helsinki, Finland (MJL); The Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, Helsinki, Finland (II, SS); The Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; The Eye and Tissue Bank Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; The Eye Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; The Evald and Hilda Nissi Foundation, Vaasa, Finland; The Oscar Öflund Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; and the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds, Helsinki, Finland (grant nos.: TYH5117 and TYH6233).

PII: S0161-6420(09)00665-4

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.037


View previous. 19 of 44 View next.