Ophthalmology
Volume 118, Issue 2 , Pages 332-338, February 2011

Development of a Risk Score for Geographic Atrophy in Complications of the Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial

Presented in part: at the meeting of the Association for Research and Vision in Ophthalmology, May 4, 2009, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

  • Gui-shuang Ying, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Gui-shuang Ying, PhD, CAPT Coordinating Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3309
  • ,
  • Maureen G. Maguire, PhD
  • ,
  • Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Research Group

      Affiliations

    • A listing of the Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) Research Group appeared in Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Research Group. Laser treatment in patients with bilateral drusen: The Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT). Ophthalmology 2006;113:1974-86.

Received 22 December 2009; received in revised form 21 June 2010; accepted 23 June 2010. published online 31 August 2010.

Available online: August 30, 2010.

Objective

To develop a risk score for developing geographic atrophy (GA) involving easily obtainable information among patients with bilateral large drusen.

Design

Cohort study within a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Participants

We included 1052 participants with ≥10 large (>125 μm) drusen and visual acuity ≥20/40 in each eye.

Methods

In the Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Prevention Trial (CAPT), 1 eye of each participant was randomly assigned to laser treatment and the contralateral eye was assigned to observation to evaluate whether laser treatment of drusen could prevent vision loss. Gradings by a reading center were used to identify: CAPT end point GA (total area of GA [>250 μm] > 1 disc area), GA (>175 μm) involving the foveal center (CGA), and GA of any size and location (any GA). Established risk factors (age, smoking status, hypertension, Age-related Eye Disease Study simple severity scale score), both with and without a novel risk factor (night vision score), were used in assigning risk points. The risk scores were evaluated for the ability to discriminate and calibrate GA risk.

Main Outcome Measures

Development of end point GA, CGA, and any GA.

Results

Among 942 CAPT participants who completed 5 years of follow-up and did not have any GA at baseline, 6.8% participants developed CAPT end point GA, 9.6% developed CGA, and 34.4% developed any GA. The 5-year incidence of end point GA in 1 or both eyes of a participant increased with the 15-point GA risk score, from 0.6% for <7 points to 15% for ≥12 points. The 5-factor risk score predicted development of GA moderately well with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–0.81) for end point GA; 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71–0.80) for CGA, and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.65–0.72) for any GA. Prediction from the risk score without the night vision score had lower AUCs (range, 0.67–0.72).

Conclusions

If validated in other patients, the GA risk score will be useful for identifying high-risk patients for clinical trials of prevention of GA and for clinical assessment of GA risk in early AMD patients.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Manuscript no. 2009-1747.

 Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

 Supported by grants EY012211, EY012261, and EY012279, from the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

PII: S0161-6420(10)00702-5

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.030

Ophthalmology
Volume 118, Issue 2 , Pages 332-338, February 2011