OphSourceHomeJournal CollectionOphSource ShopEvents
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages 1373-1379 (1 August 1998)


View previous. 15 of 48 View next.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with diabetes presenting to an urban public hospital ophthalmology clinic

Richard S. Baker, MDCorresponding Author Information1–31, Neil L. Watkins, MD1, M.Roy Wilson, MD, MS12, Mohsen Bazargan, PhD3, Charles W. Flowers Jr, MD12

Received 4 November 1997; accepted 18 January 1998.

Abstract 

Objective

This study aims to describe the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with diabetes who are newly presenting to an inner city public hospital eye clinic. This study also aims to determine the prevalence and severity of ocular morbidity in this population at time of presentation and to assess the adequacy of the ophthalmic surveillance to which this population was exposed before presentation.

Design

A clinic-based, cross-sectional study.

Participants

A total of 118 consecutive patients with diabetes participated.

Method

During a 2-month interval, all patients with diabetes newly presenting to the Los Angeles County King-Drew Medical Center eye clinic were recruited who were at risk for diabetic eye complications according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Each patient underwent a standardized interviewer-administered questionnaire and a comprehensive ophthalmic examination.

Results

Of the 118 patients, 65 (55%) were Hispanic and 51 (43%) were African American. Forty-six percent had a grade school education or less, 91% were unemployed, and 64% had no health insurance. Type two diabetes was predominant (91%), including 24 (22%) of new onset. Thirty-six patients with diabetes (31%) reported duration of diabetes greater than 10 years at time of presentation.

At time of presentation, 62% had clinically apparent ophthalmic disease, whereas 40% had advanced ocular disease, including 6.8% of the sample that were legally blind. Sixty-nine patients (58.5%) reported never having had a dilated fundus examination, whereas 31 (63%) of the 49 patients reporting a previous dilated examination were last examined more than 2 years before presentation. Timing of ophthalmic examination was classified as appropriate for 38 patients (32%), marginal for 20 patients (17%), and inappropriate for 60 patients (51%).

Conclusion

In the setting of an inner city county hospital eye clinic, where the patient population is predominately minority and of low socioeconomic status, ophthalmic surveillance of high-risk patients with diabetes is inadequate and advanced disease often is present at initial presentation. Strategies must be developed to increase the routine use of eye services within this population.

Manuscript no. 97745

1 Division of Ophthalmology, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA

2 Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

3 The Epidemiology/Biostatistics Unit, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Richard S. Baker, MD, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1621 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059 USA

 Supported in part by the NIH/NCRR/RCMI Grant G12 RR 03026-09.

PII: S0161-6420(98)98015-0

doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98015-0


View previous. 15 of 48 View next.